I have long subconsciously entertained a false division between the activities of writing and teaching music. In one mode, I am being "artistic" and "creative." In the other mode, I am "merely" imparting information.
What is art for?
If art is essentially an ego-based activity, a path towards personal achievement, then teaching is a waste of my time. It arguably takes me away from my own writing and practicing. It is also a waste of my student's time, unless they stick with their studies long enough to have something to "show" for their lessons.
In contrast, if art is about forming people into more thoughtful, analytical, emotionally mature, disciplined, and creative beings, then both paths are purposeful. Whether I'm creating a work of art myself or helping others to create art, souls (including my own) are being formed and inspired.
Actions speak louder than words. It's easy to give lip service to the ultimate spirituality of art, but if we don't value having it in our lives, however it manifests itself, we believe something else. As soon as we understand that art serves life, not the other way around, we will appreciate the value of art at every level of achievement, and in various capacities (professional, amateur, educational).
No comments:
Post a Comment